Prosecutors and courts
CTC View (formal statement of CTC's policy):
- The prosecution of bad drivers should reinforce the message that it is unacceptable to endanger and intimidate other road users, not least cyclists and pedestrians who are disproportionately affected by road crashes. Offending drivers should not be treated more leniently than those who kill or injure through non-traffic crime.
- The law states that driving is ‘dangerous’ when “…it would be obvious to a competent and careful driver that driving in that way would be dangerous.” All too often, however, prosecutors and courts dismiss such driving as ‘careless’ and the result is lenient sentencing.
- Prosecutors and courts should understand and apply the current legal definitions of ‘dangerous’ and ‘careless’ correctly. Prosecution policy and guidelines should provide accurate advice on these charges and be drafted accordingly. Equally, juries should not be misdirected on the definitions of ‘careless’ and ‘dangerous’ driving.
- Prosecutors and courts should not take the driver’s intentions into account when deciding between a charge of ‘dangerous’ or ‘careless’ driving. If the driving in question caused obviously foreseeable danger, it is irrelevant whether or not the driver meant to do harm and a ‘dangerous’ charge should be brought.
- Manslaughter or assault charges should be more widely used where there is evidence that danger was caused recklessly or intentionally.
- Specifically, looking but failing to see a cyclist at a junction is inherently dangerous, and should be prosecuted as such.
- Both the police and prosecutors should be more open and transparent about how they decide whether to charge a driver or not and, if they do charge, what charges to bring.
- Cases of bad driving should not be prosecuted in the lower courts when death or very serious injury has occurred.
- Juries should not be misdirected on the definitions of ‘careless’ and ‘dangerous’ driving.
- Courts should not let drivers off driving bans on the basis of pleas of ‘hardship’.
- Courts should not pass sentences that demean the victim who may have been killed or seriously injured. Whilst CTC does not advocate long prison sentences for dangerous driving offences arising purely from lapses of attention by generally responsible drivers, the courts should nonetheless signal disapproval by considering substantial driving bans.
- Courts should not indulge in ‘victim-blaming’ when directing juries in criminal cases or making judgements over civil compensation to the extent that it plays a part in downgrading, sentencing, acquittal and lower insurance payouts.
- Coroners should ask witnesses relevant questions and/or permit relevant questions to be asked during inquest hearings.
- Coroners should be more strongly encouraged to make Rule 43 reports on actions needed to prevent future road deaths.
Publication Date:June 2013