CTC Forum - On the road

Syndicate content
Discussion boards hosted by CTC, the national cycling charity
Updated: 1 hour 37 min ago

Re: Roadcycling fimed whit pro drone in 4k definition

21 May 2015 - 10:11am
A more suitable option for cycling;

https://youtu.be/4vGcH0Bk3hg

Re: Roadcycling fimed whit pro drone in 4k definition

21 May 2015 - 9:41am
That was impressive I have wondered about a Drone but wonder what you would do with it after a few times as in this country you would probably have filmed most of what you are allowed to?

At least in Sweden there are places with such low density populations that other people or property would not be such a problem.



Ps your English is better than my Swedish.

Re: Roadcycling fimed whit pro drone in 4k definition

21 May 2015 - 9:36am
The fat commuter wrote:I wish the terrain around here was as flat as that - and the roads as smooth.

The most horrible part of our 400k Audax two weeks back was 80 km of dead flat Rhine-Valley plain at night. It was a great relief to reach the mountains again.

Re: Roadcycling fimed whit pro drone in 4k definition

21 May 2015 - 8:58am
As a professional 'drone' pilot, I have one or two things to say about this.
1st, an Inspire 1 is an excellent machine, but it falls a little short of the 'pro' label. The main issue is that it has it's own inbuilt camera with a very wide angle lens. This is perfect for these types of shots but not everyone wants to get up close and personal with 4 spinning props!
2nd, using 1 operator is poor practice. To frame the camera, the pilot is flying by looking in the monitor rather than watching the drone. This practice inevitably kills drones but more worryingly could cause a collision with a 3rd party.
All that said, some nice footage there.

Re: Which commuter?

21 May 2015 - 5:22am
What is your budget?

A bike that I'm considering is the Planet X London Road. Gets very good reviews.

https://www.planetx.co.uk/c/q/bikes/roa ... ondon-road

Unfortunately the online customer service doesn't though so. For me this is no problem as the Sheffield shop is about a half hour cycle ride away.

Maybe looking to get this once I sell my tourer bike that I bought for commuting but don't like (Dawes Super Galaxy). Will have to go over there again and have a few test rides as I can't make my mind up over the flat bars against dropped and whether to pay the extra for the upgraded brakes.

Re: Share the space drop your pace

20 May 2015 - 11:01pm
Mark1978 wrote:What's the point in fishing if you don't eat the result?

Would you eat something you caught in the canal?

Which commuter?

20 May 2015 - 10:01pm
Looking for a commuter bike.
The commute is 16 to 20 miles to work and 12 miles home.
I want 28mm tyres and full mudguards, it will end up with flat bars.
And comfort is slightly more important than speed but only just.

Any suggestions?

Re: Question about this video

20 May 2015 - 9:57pm
Paulatic wrote:I still take issue when you say "the cyclists hold their line" if that is so then why limply stick your hand out to suggest to anyone behind that your intention is to move to the right?
We can't know for certain why he stuck his hand out. I suppose that he stuck his arm out to indicate that he would move into the right lane that was developing after the slip road. He had not reason to expect a vehicle there; there wasn't yet a lane there.

Re: Snarky safety notice anyone?

20 May 2015 - 9:25pm
I still wouldn't call it snarky.
And bar the bit about other vehicles, it all seems reasonable enough.

We all know here that even adult frames are designed to take only up to certain weights, and can fail in time if they are ridden by people who are too heavy for them, especially if they're ridden in a way they clearly aren't designed for (like my lightweight road bike being used as if it was a MTB), but parents who aren't cyclists may not know/appreciate all that, so what's wrong with the company being specific?
I also wonder if, with so many kids now being grossly overweight, it isn't a timely reminder to make sure the kid has a bike that is (as we say about horses) 'up to weight'.

Re: Share the space drop your pace

20 May 2015 - 8:58pm
gaz wrote:Si wrote:Bloody Poles coming over here pinching the jobs off of good British rods.....sorry, I was looking for the immigration thread
The British rod industry died out years ago, it's all Exage or Ultegra now.
There are still many people producing rods in the UK, but in common with many other products it occupies the high-end sector as the Far Eastern manufacturers take the mass market.

Re: Question about this video

20 May 2015 - 8:38pm
Tonyf33 wrote:Vorpal wrote:Tonyf33 wrote:so hang on, it sounds like most of you are blaming the cyclist here..WHAT THE HELL IS THE MATTER WITH YOU!!!
The HGV comes thundering past UNDERTAKING whilst driving over the chevrons with not enough space to get past at a ridiculous speed, basically couldn't be arsed to overtake or made a late decision not come off the off ramp.
The cyclist wants to move over into the inside lane which IF he had actually moved over he'd be dead

For those of you saying he probably shouldn't be there, how do you know what is acceptable in that country, do you say that a cyclist in this country on a d/c shouldn't be there because of fast moving motorvehicles?
I don't think anyone is blaming the cyclists. Maybe suggesting some things that could have been done to avoid the incident, but that's not blame. Frankly, the video is shocking, but we don't know the road, what happened before the incident, or anything else.

Well actually we do, we can see everything I've described,
we can see that a mirror would have made no difference, we can see that the HGV crosses the chevrons illegally, we can see that the HGV undertakes at a ridiculous speed, we can see that the HGV passes far too close to a vulnerable road user at a point of the road where there is no space nor suitable by any stretch of the imagination, we can see that the cyclists hold their line, we can see that the HGV collides with the cyclists and injures one of them, we can see that the HGV doesn't stop, we can see EVERYTHING that we need to see to know there was only one person at fault here and that wasn't the cyclist.

I have no doubt at all the driving was atrocious and the driver must have the brain of a moron.
I still take issue when you say "the cyclists hold their line" if that is so then why limply stick your hand out to suggest to anyone behind that your intention is to move to the right?

Re: Share the space drop your pace

20 May 2015 - 7:50pm
I liked the illustration they used for this on Facebook
Duck lane.JPG
First time I've ever seen a Duck Lane!

Rick.

Re: Share the space drop your pace

20 May 2015 - 7:46pm
What's the point in fishing if you don't eat the result?

Re: Share the space drop your pace

20 May 2015 - 7:35pm
Richard Fairhurst wrote:There are actually notices up on several canals to tell Polish (and other) anglers that, when you've caught a fish, you put it back rather than taking it home and cooking it: http://www.anglingtrust.net/page.asp?section=709

so is it generally not permitted to eat the fish?

Re: Share the space drop your pace

20 May 2015 - 7:31pm
Si wrote:Bloody Poles coming over here pinching the jobs off of good British rods.....sorry, I was looking for the immigration thread
The British rod industry died out years ago, it's all Exage or Ultegra now.

Re: Question about this video

20 May 2015 - 6:55pm
Sorry. I thought that I wrote, Frankly, the video is shocking, but we don't know the road, what happened before the incident, or anything else that isn't in the video.

I see now that I left off the last bit.

Why didn't you understand what I meant to say?

Re: Roadcycling fimed whit pro drone in 4k definition

20 May 2015 - 5:26pm
I wish the terrain around here was as flat as that - and the roads as smooth.

Re: Question about this video

20 May 2015 - 3:41pm
Vorpal wrote:Tonyf33 wrote: we can see EVERYTHING that we need to see to know there was only one person at fault here and that wasn't the cyclist.
I was not trying to imply otherwise. I certainly wasn't trying to blame the cyclists.
I was responding to you saying this "but we don't know the road, what happened before the incident, or anything else"
Do you not think in hindsight that that sentence is pretty wide of the mark? You effectively said we don't know what happened at all, the thing is we do know what happened and why.
I never tried to imply that you did blame the cyclist/s, just that when you say we don't know what happened that simply isn't accurate.

Re: Heathrow Terminals 1, 2 and 3: Cycling out of?

20 May 2015 - 3:25pm
Thanks, Iviehoff. And with our Freedom passes, pay zilch from Hayes and Harlington!

Re: Question about this video

20 May 2015 - 1:56pm
Tonyf33 wrote: we can see EVERYTHING that we need to see to know there was only one person at fault here and that wasn't the cyclist.
I was not trying to imply otherwise. I certainly wasn't trying to blame the cyclists.

Archive

  • Patron: Her Majesty The Queen
  • President: Jon Snow
  • Chief Executive: Paul Tuohy
  • Cyclists' Touring Club (CTC): A company limited by guarantee, registered in England no.25185. Registered as a charity in England and Wales No 1147607 and in Scotland No SC042541

Copyright © CTC 2015

Terms and Conditions