CTC Forum - On the road

Syndicate content
Discussion boards hosted by CTC, the national cycling charity
Updated: 20 min 4 sec ago

Re: Modern bikes is ugly, innit

29 September 2014 - 11:38am
Bonefishblues wrote:It's the paint and decal schemes that I find remarkably ugly, by and large.
Yep, I agree. Having bought a Croix de Fer the other year, pretty much the first thing I did was take those horrid Alexrims decals off the wheels. I have no idea who Alex is or why he thinks he has the right to plaster his bad typography over my bike, but he doesn't.

Re: Modern bikes is ugly, innit

29 September 2014 - 11:29am
When I bought my current bike, the choice was grey or grey. I called it Saltash, partly after the frigate in The Cruel Sea not known for being bright in colour, partly because it was winter and the roads were salty at the time.

I'd have preferred red, or if not maybe blue, or possibly silver. But on the plus side it doesn't attract thieves, as in bad light against a Sheffield rack you can hardly see it.

Relish Running Event in Bath 2 Tunnels

29 September 2014 - 7:13am
I went for a 30 mile spin yesterday including the Bath 2 Tunnels. I was unaware there was a HUGE running event taking place and plunged northbound in the tunnels. Heading southbound were over 1000 runners! Yikes. Lucky I had a bell and lights.

I was seriously impressed with the competition runners' tolerance towards Sunday leisure cyclists and how NORMAL it was for them to share without complaint. I didn't hear any angry exchanges and I don't think there were any collisions.

I for one will be looking out for runners and joggers from now on...hc

Re: Knocked off bicycle. Driver won't give insurance details

28 September 2014 - 11:49pm
puffin wrote:This might sound too good to be true... but if you have his car index number (registration) I reckon your problems might be over.....

Go to this link (its a link from the DVLA site to the Motor Insurance Bureau site) and you can get all that you need

http://www.askmid.com/askmidenquiry.aspx
All well and good until it turns out to be a cloned number plate which are on the rise and will be even more difficult to spot once we no longer have VED discs come the end of this month..

Re: Knocked off bicycle. Driver won't give insurance details

28 September 2014 - 9:40pm
This might sound too good to be true... but if you have his car index number (registration) I reckon your problems might be over.....

Go to this link (its a link from the DVLA site to the Motor Insurance Bureau site) and you can get all that you need

http://www.askmid.com/askmidenquiry.aspx

Re: Modern bikes is ugly, innit

28 September 2014 - 8:18pm


Wouldn't that be nice.
NOT.

Re: Modern bikes is ugly, innit

28 September 2014 - 7:59pm
Yes that would be great, even the titanium bikes could be black then.

Re: Modern bikes is ugly, innit

28 September 2014 - 7:57pm
[XAP]Bob wrote:Why paint Ti? It's not needed from a corrosion perspective, and it saves weight - and you have to show off the material as well...My glasses frames are Ti and are a dark copper brown.
Mrs Mick F's glasses are Ti and are green and turquoise.

Why not Ti bike frames?

Re: commute distance, folder or road bike?

28 September 2014 - 7:53pm
For me, unless there's a problem storing the bike at the destination, or it needs to fold to get it on a train etc. I would use a "Road" bike. I use quotes 'cos there's a question of what you mean by "Road" bike - I used to commute (occasionally) into Birmingham city centre on my Galaxy which is a "Road" bike in this context. (My employer found me somewhere to store it, though I had to carry it through part of the office off the ground so I didn't get the carpet dirty, and up high at one point to avoid damaging £3,000 worth of reception desk!) Co-incidentally they installed a shower in the loo about this time, not sure if it was a bit of quiet hinting by my colleagues re. a sweaty person sitting next to them all day

Re: Knocked off bicycle. Driver won't give insurance details

28 September 2014 - 7:47pm
Whenever I've been involved in a accident (and over the years I've been involved in no less than 8 of them resulting in a claim from me against the other party, being the "victim" of someone else's accident in each case) I've made sure I have the number plate of the other car involved. If the driver does not give me his/her details I always say something like "Look, I've got your number, either you can give me your details or I'll let the police sort it out". This does the trick _ I even do it if there's obviously no damage, just in case. I'm happy to let him/her sweat until they realise I'm not going to take any action.

The camera on my mobile phone helps too, 'cos I can take piccies of the car, it's driver, and any damage on the spot. Oh, and don't write the details down yourself, get the other person to do it and hand it to you, that way it cannot be claimed that you made a mistake.

But I've never asked for insurance details, nor have I given them. Your claim is against the driver, and it is his/her details you give to your insurance company. He/she then passes any letters from you or your insurer to his/her insurer.

Quite often these days you don't actually get a paper certificate from the insurer of your car, you get an online confirmation where you can download and print them. I don't bother with a printout unlessI'm traveling abroad, if I need the policy number it's with my documents at home, and if there is a legal requirement to disclose then this will happen later.

So what I'm saying is - don't worry about not seeing insurance details, if need be the DVLA can link the car reg and the insurance (at least as far as knowing the car is insured) - this is how car taxing now works.

If the car driver is not insured that's his/her hard luck, it comes out of thier own pocket instead of an insurance companies pocket. And you can have him/her done for driving while not insured. And if you are insured and your insurer pays you, then the insurer will claim off the offending driver. Which is a good reason to carry your own insurance!

Re: Modern bikes is ugly, innit

28 September 2014 - 7:37pm
Mick F wrote:It the fashion for black that gets up my nose. Even cycle clothing is fashionable black.
Components are black, and frames are often black, or coloured to compensate for the black.

I prefer shiny bling components and brightly coloured frames.

Why is CF black?
Why isn't Ti painted?

Carbon is black, so CF is black. You could colour the resin I suppose.

Why paint Ti? It's not needed from a corrosion perspective, and it saves weight - and you have to show off the material as well...

Re: Modern bikes is ugly, innit

28 September 2014 - 6:03pm
It's the paint and decal schemes that I find remarkably ugly, by and large.

Re: Modern bikes is ugly, innit

28 September 2014 - 6:01pm
Look at the understated elegance of slim steel tubes from the late 80s before everything went fat. But as we all know, fat is stiffer and stiffer is good innit!

Agree about black. It seems odd to me that I consider skin wall tyres as being good looking whereas a modern generation thinks anything other than black for a sidewall is ugly.

Re: Modern bikes is ugly, innit

28 September 2014 - 5:59pm
Its the same with cars..... matt black becoming popular AND it costs a lot more. Dont get it myself.

Re: Modern bikes is ugly, innit

28 September 2014 - 5:53pm
It the fashion for black that gets up my nose. Even cycle clothing is fashionable black.
Components are black, and frames are often black, or coloured to compensate for the black.

I prefer shiny bling components and brightly coloured frames.

Why is CF black?
Why isn't Ti painted?

Modern bikes is ugly, innit

28 September 2014 - 5:48pm
Is what I thought after wandering around the Bike Show today. Especially hard tail MTBs......the big wheels and bulbous carbon tubes just make them look so heavy and cumbersome.

There were a few steel road bikes, and indeed, one or two tourers with chromed bits too, and these just looked so 'right' in comparison. Not saying that steel is a better functioning material - just talking about the look.

Yeah, I know, eye of the beholder, etc. But you know I'm right

Re: FillThatHole - Dying ? Come on CTC

28 September 2014 - 4:03pm
They are interested - just been talking to them about it at the Cycle Show. Problem is that they were running around like headless chickens getting everything ready for the show last week and so that was their priority. Hopefully they will get around to FTH once they are home, unpacked and recovered!

Re: Hit and Run

28 September 2014 - 3:39pm
Not good. Hope the cyclist mends well and quickly.

Re: FillThatHole - Dying ? Come on CTC

28 September 2014 - 2:38pm
Si wrote:Returning to the original question - I've asked someone at National Office if they would like to comment on the thread. Hopefully they should be along in the next few days to do so.

Well it seems they are not interested.

They don't reply to my e-mails, don't contribute here. It really makes one wonder what on earth is going on with the CTC. I actually spend some time discussing the system with somebody from the CTC earlier in the year (at their request, they called me). I must be a major user (I've reported over 250 hazards this year), offered to participate in beta trials, and actually spent a large part of my career designing/implementing software for hand held devices (but for industrial applications).

So I guess the only thing left to do is to put in a Freedom of Information request to Dept of Transport, explaining that I have tried to find out via the CTC and expressing my concerns about the organisation as well as the project.

CTC should be answerable to it's members - and that means NOT ignoring e-mails.

Ian

Archive

  • Patron: Her Majesty The Queen
  • President: Jon Snow
  • Chief Executive: Paul Tuohy
  • Cyclists' Touring Club (CTC): A company limited by guarantee, registered in England no.25185. Registered as a charity in England and Wales No 1147607 and in Scotland No SC042541

 

Terms and Conditions